张玉芬,万德余,孙银梅,董文侠,梁西俊
ZHANG Yufen,WAN Deyu,SUN Yinmei,DONG Wenxia,LIANG Xijun

• 1:亳州市人民医院创伤骨科

摘要(Abstract)：

目的:探讨舒芬太尼静脉自控镇痛对关节镜辅助下跟骨骨折复位固定术后镇痛和谵妄的影响。方法:将行关节镜辅助下跟骨骨折复位固定术的74例患者随机均分为对照组和观察组,对照组采用芬太尼静脉自控镇痛,观察组患者采用舒芬太尼静脉自控镇痛;比较2组患者术后镇静评分、镇痛评分,48 h内不良反应发生情况及术后1周内谵妄发生率。结果:观察组患者术后48 h内5个时间点(2、4、8、24及48 h)的镇痛和镇静评分均明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05);术后48 h内,对照组与观察组不良反应发生率分别为29. 73%、10. 81%,2组比较差异有统计学意义(χ~2=10. 378 1,P <0. 001); 2组患者术后1周谵妄发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ~2=1. 014 2,P=0. 314)。结论:舒芬太尼静脉自控镇痛对关节镜辅助下跟骨骨折复位固定术后镇痛和镇静的效果优于芬太尼静脉自控镇痛,但对术后谵妄的发生率无影响。
Objective: To investigate the effect of sufentanil intravenously controlled analgesia on postoperative analgesia and delirium after arthroscope-assisted calcaneal fractures reduction and fixation. Methods: 74 patients of arthroscope-assisted calcaneal fractures reduction and fixation were selected as the subjects. The patients were randomly divided into control group and observation group with 37 cases in each group. The patients in the observation group were treated with sufentanil intravenous analgesia and the control group with fentanil intravenous analgesia. The incidence of postoperative sedation,analgesia,adverse reactions within 48 hours and delirium within 1 week were compared between the two groups. Results: The analgesia and sedation of patients were compared at 5 time points( 2,4,8,24,and 48 h) within 48 hours after operation. Results showed that the analgesic and sedative scores of the patients in the observation group were lower than those in the control group at each time point,and the difference was statistically significant( P < 0. 05). During the 48 hours after operation,the incidence of adverse reactions in the control group and the observation group was29. 73% and 10. 81% respectively,which was statistically significant( χ~2= 10. 378 1,P < 0. 001).There was no significant difference in postoperative delirium within 1 week between the two groups( χ~2=1. 014 2,P = 0. 314). Conclusion: Sufentanil intravenously controlled analgesia has better analgesic effect while has fewer effect on postoperative delirium for patients of arthroscopic-assisted calcaneal fractures reduction and fixation operation.

关键词(KeyWords)： 舒芬太尼;镇痛;谵妄;静脉自控镇痛;跟骨骨折;镇静
sufentanil;analgesia;delirium;intravenous controlled analgesia;calcaneal fracture;sedation

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家卫生计生委医药卫生科技发展研究项目(W2015QJ058)

作者(Author): 张玉芬,万德余,孙银梅,董文侠,梁西俊
ZHANG Yufen,WAN Deyu,SUN Yinmei,DONG Wenxia,LIANG Xijun

DOI: 10.19367/j.cnki.2096-8388.2020.12.017

参考文献(References)：

• [1]郑江，赵平，陈尔东，等．静脉自控镇痛与多模镇痛对跟骨骨折术后镇痛效果的比较研究[J]．山西医药杂志，2017,46(3):316-318.
• [2]郭凤英．骨科手术病人不同时机舒芬太尼患者自控静脉镇痛术后镇痛的效果及不良反应分析[J]．中国伤残医学，2019,27(15):17-18.
• [3]支梦佳，刁一凡，刘诗洋，等．舒芬太尼与芬太尼用于剖宫产术后静脉自控镇痛有效性和安全性的系统评价[J]．中国循证医学杂志，2019,19(3):324-330.
• [4]DINGEMANS S A,DE RUITER K J,BIRNIE M F N,et al. comparable postoperative pain levels using 2 different nerve blocks in the operative treatment of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures[J]. Foot Ankle Int,2017,38(12):1352-1356.
• [5]杨娜瑜，姜丽华．老年患者术后谵妄的研究进展[J]．临床麻醉学杂志，2013,29(10):1039-1040.
• [6]陈惠英．舒芬太尼预防瑞芬太尼麻醉后早期疼痛的临床疗效[J]．中国医学创新，2015,12(17):53-55.
• [7]王军，纪媛媛，陈文劲，等．神经外科ICU患者谵妄预测模型的建立及验证[J]．中国护理管理，2019,19(12):1833-1837.
• [8]黄耀凯，唐鹏．医护人员对足踝创伤患者VAS评分的差异性研究[J]．创伤外科杂志，2019,21(8):624-625,633.
• [9]王志国，柏宁，李炜．纳布啡联合舒芬太尼对全髋关节置换术患者镇痛评分、镇静评分的影响[J]．中国基层医药，2019,26(9):1119-1122.
• [10]MORLION B,SCHFER M,BETTERIDGE N,et al.Non-invasive patient-controlled analgesia in the management of acute postoperative pain in the hospital setting[J]. Curr Med Res Opin,2018,34(7):1179-1186.
• [11]蒋际钊，张梅刃．硬膜外自控镇痛泵(PCEA)应用于跟骨骨折内固定术后疼痛控制的临床疗效及安全性研究[J]．足踝外科电子杂志，2019,6(1):1-4.
• [12]白雪波，李瑜．神经刺激器联合超声引导下行连续坐骨神经阻滞在跟骨骨折术后镇痛中的应用[J]．系统医学，2017,2(17):59-61.
• [13]DINGES H C,OTTO S,STAY D K,et al. Side effect rates of opioids in equianalgesic doses via intravenous patient-controlled analgesia:a systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. Anesth Analg,2019,129(4):1153-1162.
• [14]吴蔚华，蔡少英，程春林，等．不同剂量舒芬太尼静脉自控镇痛联合关节腔内注射用于全膝关节置换术后的镇痛效果[J]．中国医学创新，2019,16(32):31-35.
• [15]安立，张贤亮，贾慧园，等．舒芬太尼应用于老年全髋关节置换术后静脉自控镇痛价值研究[J]．饮食保健，2018,5(51):30-31.
• [16]LU S,MA S C,WANG Y Y,et al. Comparison of pain relief between patient-controlled epidural analgesia and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for patients undergoing spinal fusion surgeries[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2015,135(9):1247-1255.
• [17]张庆燕．右美托咪定复合舒芬太尼在下肢骨折患者术后静脉自控镇痛中的应用研究[J]．母婴世界，2019,11(2):31-33.
• [18]徐嘉莹，桑诺尔，任丽英，等．不同舒芬太尼配置浓度对术后患者静脉自控镇痛效果和不良反应的影响[J]．中国医学科学院学报，2017,39(3):406-410.
• [19]TOKTA爦Z O,KONAKI M,YILMAZ B,et al. Pain control following posterior spine fusion:patient-controlled continuous epidural catheter infusion method yields better post-operative analgesia control compared to intravenous patient controlled analgesia method. a retrospective case series[J]. Eur Spine J,2016,25(5):1608-1613.
• [20]谢建伟，许培红，朱爱军，等．超声引导下腘窝入路坐骨神经阻滞联合PCIA在跟骨术后镇痛中的应用效果分析[J]．浙江创伤外科，2017,22(1):189-190.
• [21]杨国平，刘润润．坐骨神经股骨外侧入路连续阻滞用于跟骨和踝部手术后镇痛的效果观察[J]．医药前沿，2018,8(22):68-73.
• [22]钱家树，宋振东，林学正．不同剂量的羟考酮配伍舒芬太尼用于术后自控静脉镇痛的效果比较[J]．中国临床药学杂志，2019,28(2):81-85.
• [23]王海燕，许燕玲，胡三莲，等．多模式镇痛方法对跟骨骨折术后患者镇痛效果的影响[J]．中国实用护理杂志，2016,32(23):1788-1790.
• [24]李哲．舒芬太尼和右美托咪啶应用于临床麻醉及术后镇痛的效果观察[J]．临床医药文献杂志，2018,5(23):49-51.
• [25]苏振城．舒芬太尼和右美托咪啶应用于临床麻醉及术后镇痛的效果观察[J]．心血管外科杂志(电子版)，2020,9(2):70-71.

文章评论(Comment)：