刘咏梅,赵蓉,李艳玲,李玲,李勇冀
LIU Yongmei,ZHAO Rong,LI Yanling,LI Ling,LI Yongji

• 1:贵州医科大学医学检验学院
• 2:贵州医科大学附院中心实验室
• 3:贵州市第三人民医院检验科

摘要(Abstract)：

目的:分析骨髓细胞形态学(M)、细胞免疫学(I)、细胞遗传学(C)和分子生物学(M)联合方法(MICM分型)在白血病诊断中的价值。方法:收集196例白血病患者骨髓细胞形态学、细胞免疫学、细胞遗传学及分子生物学检查结果,比较分析单一的形态学分型、单一细胞免疫学分型、形态学联合细胞免疫学分型与MICM分型4种检查方法对白血病诊断的符合率。结果:196例患者,单一形态学分型、单一细胞免疫学分型、形态学联合细胞免疫学分型与MICM分型4种方法对白血病的诊断符合例数分别为158、159、182例、196例,符合率分别为80.6%、81.1%、92.8%、100%;形态学联合细胞免疫学分型比单一细胞形态学或单一细胞免疫学分型诊断符合率高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);MICM分型比形态学联合细胞免疫学分型诊断符合率高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:MICM分型可提高白血病的诊断率。
Objective: To explore the clinical value of MICM typing in the diagnosis of leukemia.Methods: 196 cases of patients with diagnosed leukemia were enrolled in this study,and the experimental results of cell morphology,cellular immunology,cytogenetics and molecular biology of their bone marrow cell were collected. 4 examination methods including single cell morphology typing,single cellular immunology typing,cell morphology combined with cellular immunology typing and MICM typing were compared for diagnosis accuracy of leukemia. Results: In 196 cases of patients with leukemia,the diagnostic accordance rate of single cell morphology typing was 80. 6%(158 /196),the diagnostic accordance rate of single cellular immunology typing was 81. 1%(159 /196),the diagnostic accordance rate of cell morphology combined with cellular immunology typing was 92. 8%( 182 /196)and the diagnostic accordance rate of MICM typing was 100%(196 /196). The diagnostic accordance rate of cell morphology combined with cellular immunology typing was significantly higher than that of single cell morphology typing or single cellular immunology typing( P < 0. 01) while the diagnostic accordance rate of MICM typing was significantly higher than that of cell morphology combined with cellular immunology typing( P < 0. 01). Conclusion: MICM typing can improve the diagnostic rate of leukemia.

关键词(KeyWords)： 白血病;细胞;形态学;免疫学技术;染色体;分子生物学
leukemia;cell;morphology;immunology;chromosome;molecular biology

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 刘咏梅,赵蓉,李艳玲,李玲,李勇冀
LIU Yongmei,ZHAO Rong,LI Yanling,LI Ling,LI Yongji

DOI: 10.19367/j.cnki.1000-2707.2016.02.031

参考文献(References)：

• [1]谭齐贤,张树平.临床血液学和血液检验[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:192.
• [2]李顺义.重视WHO(2008)造血与淋巴组织肿瘤分类标准的普及和推广[J].疑难病杂志,2012(8):573-574.
• [3]张之南,沈悌.血液病诊断及疗效标准[M].3版.北京:科学出版社,2007:106-121.
• [4]刘艳荣,于弘,常艳,等.四色荧光标记抗体在白血病免疫分型中的应用及意义[J].中华实验血液学杂志,2002(5):423-427.
• [5]中国免疫学会血液免疫分会临床流式细胞术学组.四色流式细胞术用于急性白血病免疫分型的中国专家共识[J].中华血液学杂志,2015(4):265-271.
• [6]谷芳娜,李国辉,刘利.急性髓系白血病染色体核型及免疫表型分布及治疗后临床疗效分析[J].昆明医科大学学报,2015(3):113-116.
• [7]李志刚,吴敏媛,赵玮,等.多重RT-PCR方法同时检测29种白血病融合基因[J].中华血液学杂志,2003(5):256-258.
• [8]刘晓红,季海生.81例急性髓系白血病形态学与免疫学分型分析[J].医学检验与临床,2009(5):69-71.
• [9]杨峥,莫武宁,李山.505例白血病应用流式细胞术免疫分型与FAB分型的结果分析[J].中国实验诊断学,2010(8):1238-1241.
• [10]张云宁,曹峰,陈静.158例急性白血病形态学与免疫学分型的比较[J].海南医学,2011(23):28-31.

文章评论(Comment)：