新辅助治疗强化模式改善Ⅱ/Ⅲ期直肠癌患者的疗效Efficacy of intensified neoadjuvant therapy regimen in improving outcomes for stage Ⅱ/Ⅲ rectal cancer patients
武月,王文玲,王刚,陈唯唯,董洪敏,李国栋,李小凯
WU Yue,WANG Wenling,WANG Gang,CHEN Weiwei,DONG Hongmin,LI Guodong,LI Xiaokai
摘要(Abstract):
目的 观察新辅助治疗强化模式改善伴高危因素的Ⅱ/Ⅲ期直肠癌患者疗效。方法 选取伴高危因素的Ⅱ/Ⅲ期直肠癌患者123例,分为新辅助奥沙利铂(m FOLFOX6)同步放化疗(CRT)组(m FOLFOX6+CRT组,n=60)和单药氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)同步CRT组(5-FU+CRT组,n=63),m FOLFOX6+CRT组患者行盆腔常规分割放疗期间给予2周期m FOLFOX6方案同步化疗,5-FU+CRT组患者盆腔行常规分割放疗期间给予5-FU225 mg/(m~2·d)、持续静脉泵入第1~5天/周、连用5周,2组患者均完成术前新辅助同步CRT后5~12周行全直肠系膜切除术(TME),术后4周2组患者行术后辅助化疗;比较2组患者TME术后肿瘤完全缓解(p CR)率、肿瘤降期率、R0切除率、局部复发率、远处转移率、总生存率(OS)及不良反应发生率等。结果 与5-FU+CRT组比较,m FOLFOX6+CRT组患者的p CR率升高(20.8%vs 5.9%,P=0.026)、肿瘤降期率升高(77.4%vs60.8%,P=0.067)、R0切除率降低(88.7%vs 92.2%,P=0.742),3年局部复发率降低(3.8%vs 9.8%,P=0.265)、远处转移率降低(17.0%vs 33.5%,P=0.044),及OS升高(71.7%vs 67.4%,P=0.557);调整2组患者p CR率与肿瘤的临床T、N分期及新辅助CRT与手术间隔时间的差异后,m FOLFOX6+CRT组患者更有可能达到p CR[P=0.007,OR值为7.38,95%CI(1.72~31.72)]; 2组患者治疗期间不良反应、术中及术后并发症发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。结论 m FOLFOX6同步CRT与标准的5-FU同步CRT相比,可显著提高伴高危因素Ⅱ/Ⅲ期直肠癌患者的近期疗效(p CR率),对远期疗效也有一定改善、能降低远处转移率。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of an intensified neoadjuvant therapy regimen in improving outcomes for stageⅡ/Ⅲrectal cancer patients with high-risk factors.Methods A total of123 stageⅡ/Ⅲrectal cancer patients with high-risk factors were enrolled and divided into two groups:neoadjuvant m FOLFOX6 concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) group (m FOLFOX6+CRT,n=60) and single-agent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) concurrent CRT group (5-FU+CRT,n=63).The m FOLFOX6+CRT group received two cycles of m FOLFOX6 concurrent with pelvic conventional fractionated radiotherapy,while the 5-FU+CRT group received 5-FU 225 mg/(m~2·d) continuous intravenous infusion on days 1-5 weekly for five weeks during radiotherapy.Both groups underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) 5-12 weeks after completing neoadjuvant therapy,followed by adjuvant chemotherapy 4 weeks post-surgery.Pathologic complete response (p CR) rate,tumor downstaging rate,R0 resection rate,local recurrence,distant metastasis,overall survival (OS),and adverse events were compared between groups.Results The m FOLFOX6+CRT group showed significantly higher pCR rate (20.8%vs 5.9%,P=0.026),tumor downstaging rate (77.4%vs 60.8%,P=0.067),and 3-year OS (71.7%vs 67.4%,P=0.557) compared to the 5-FU+CRT group.The m FOLFOX6+CRT group also had lower 3-year local recurrence (3.8%vs 9.8%,P=0.265),distant metastasis (17.0%vs 33.5%,P=0.044),and R0 resection rates (88.7%vs 92.2%,P=0.742).After adjusting for imbalances,the m FOLFOX6+CRT group was more likely to achieve pCR(OR=7.38,95%CI was 1.72-31.72,P=0.007).There were no significant differences in adverse events or surgical complications between groups (P>0.05).Conclusion Compared to standard 5-FU concurrent CRT,neoadjuvant m FOLFOX6 concurrent CRT significantly improves short-term outcomes (p CR rate) and shows potential long-term benefits in reducing distant metastasis for stageⅡ/Ⅲrectal cancer patients with high-risk factors.
关键词(KeyWords):
直肠癌;高危因素;新辅助m FOLFOX6;同步放化疗;病理完全缓解率;总生存率
rectal cancer;high-risk factors;neoadjuvant m FOLFOX6;concurrent chemoradiotherapy;pathologic complete response rate;overall survival rate
基金项目(Foundation): 贵州省教育厅创新群体重大研究项目(黔教合KY字[2018]020)
作者(Author):
武月,王文玲,王刚,陈唯唯,董洪敏,李国栋,李小凯
WU Yue,WANG Wenling,WANG Gang,CHEN Weiwei,DONG Hongmin,LI Guodong,LI Xiaokai
DOI: 10.19367/j.cnki.2096-8388.2024.04.012
参考文献(References):
- [1]BRAY F,FERl AY J,SOERJOMATARAM I,et al.Global cancer statistics 2018:globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J].CA:A Cancer Journal for Clinicians,2018,68(6):394-424.
- [2]宋亚波.2018年全国癌症统计数据公布[J].中华医学信息导报,2018,33(7):6.
- [3]代建德,喻淼.268例结直肠癌误诊漏诊原因分析[J].医学美学美容,2013,22(4):2.
- [4]GUNDERSON L L,JESSUP J M,SARGENT D J,et al.Revised tumor and node categorization for rectal cancer based on surveillance,epidemiology,and end results and rectal pooled analysis outcomes[J].Journal of Clinical Oncology,2010,28(2):256-263.
- [5]BENSON A B,VENOOK A P,Al-HAWARY M M,et al.Colon cancer,version 2.2021,NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology[J].National Comprehensive Cancer Network,2021,19(3):329-359.
- [6]国家卫生健康委.中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2020年版)[J].中国实用外科杂志,2020,40(6):600-630.
- [7]LI Y,WANG J,MA X,et al.A review of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer[J].Internation Journal of Biological Sciences,2016,12(8):1022-1031.
- [8]SAUER R,LIERSCH T,MERKEL S,et al.Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer:results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median followup of 11 years[J].Journal of Clinical Oncology,2012,30(16):1926-1933.
- [9]LEE B C,PARK I J,KIM C W,et al.Matched casecontrol analysis comparing oncologic outcomes between preoperative and postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer[J].Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research,2017,92(4):200-207.
- [10]GLIMELIUS B,TIRET E,CERVANTES A,et al.Rectal cancer:ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis,treatment and follow-up[J].Annal of Oncology,2013,24 (Suppl 6):81-88.
- [11]彭俊杰,朱骥,刘方奇,等.中国II/III期直肠癌诊疗专家共识[J].中国癌症杂志,2017,27(1):41-80.
- [12]BENSON A B,VENOOK A P,AL-HAWARY M M,et al.NCCN guidelines insights:rectal cancer,version 6.2020[J].National Comprehensive Cancer Network,2020,18(7):806-815.
- [13]BODY A,PRENEN H,LAM M,et al.Neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer:recent advances and ongoing challenges[J].Clinical Colorectal Cancer,2021,20(1):29-41.
- [14]MARTIN S T,HENEGHAN H M,WINTER D C,et al.Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes following pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer[J].British Journal of Surgery,2012,99(7):918-928
- [15]国家卫生计生委医政医管局,中华医学会肿瘤学分会.中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2015版)[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2015,18 (10):961-973.
- [16]EISENHAUER E A,THERASSE P,BOGAERTS J,et al.New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours:revised recist guideline (version 1.1)[J].European Journal of Cancer,2009,45(2):228-247.
- [17]ON J,SHIM J,MACKAY C,et al.Pathological response post neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer is an independent predictor of survival[J].Colorectal Disease,2021,23(6):1326-1333.
- [18]HOFHEINZ R D,ARNOLD D,FOKAS E,et al.Impact of age on the efficacy of oxaliplatin in the preoperative chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy of rectal cancer:a post hoc analysis of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04phase III trial[J].Annal of Oncology,2018,29 (8):1793-1799.
- [19]张玲,李显蓉.结直肠癌合并糖尿病患者围手术期血糖管理研究现状[J].西南医科大学学报,2022,45(1):88-92.
- [20]O'CONNELL M J,COLANGELO L H,BEART R W,et al.Capecitabine and oxaliplatin in the preoperative multimodality treatment of rectal cancer:surgical end points from national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project trial R-04[J].Journal of Clinical Oncology,2014,32(18):1927-1934.
- [21]AZRIA D,DOYEN J,JARLIER M,et al.Late toxicities and clinical outcome at 5 years of the ACCORD 12/0405-PRODIGE 02 trial comparing two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for intermediate-risk rectal cancer[J].Annal of Oncology,2017,28(10):2436-2442.
- [22]魏盼,张怀波,周方圆,等.预见性护理在腹腔镜结直肠癌根治自然腔道取标本术围术期的应用[J].西南医科大学学报,2023,46(5):434-437.
- [23]FU X L,FANG Z,SHU L H,et al.Meta-analysis of oxaliplatin-based versus fluorouracil-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer[J].Oncotarget,2017,8 (21):34340-34351.
- [24]DENG Y,CHI P,LAN P,et al.Neoadjuvant modified FOLFOX6 with or without radiation versus fluorouracil plus radiation for locally advanced rectal cancer:final results of the Chinese FOWARC trial[J].Journal of Clinical Oncology,2019,37(34):3223-3233.
- [25]VANDER V M,HILLING D E,BASTIAANNET E,et al.Long-term outcomes of clinical complete responders after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer in the international watch&wait database (IWWD):an international multicentre registry study[J].Lancet,2018,391(10139):2537-2545.
- [26]CALVO F A,MORILLO V,SANTOS M,et al.Interval between neoadjuvant treatment and definitive surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer:impact on response and oncologic outcomes[J].Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology,2014,140(10):1651-1660.
- [27]KALADY M F,DE CAMPOS-LOBATO L F,STOCCHIL,et al.Predictive factors of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer[J].Annals of Surgery,2015,250(4):582-589.
- [28]ZENG W G,ZHOU Z X,LIANG J W,et al.Impact of interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for rectal cancer on surgical and oncologic outcome[J].Journal of Surgical Oncology,2014,110 (4):463-467.
- [29]FRANCOIS Y,NEMOZ C J,BAULIEUX J,et al.Influence of the interval between preoperative radiation therapy and surgery on downstaging and on the rate of sphinctersparing surgery for rectal cancer:the Lyon R90-01 randomized trial[J].Journal of Clinical Oncology,1999,17(8):2396-2396.
- [30]SLOOTHAAK D,GEIJSEN D E,VAN LEERSUM N J,et al.Optimal time interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for rectal cancer[J].British Journal of Surgery,2013,100(7):933-939.
文章评论(Comment):
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
- 直肠癌
- 高危因素
- 新辅助m FOLFOX6
- 同步放化疗
- 病理完全缓解率
- 总生存率
rectal cancer - high-risk factors
- neoadjuvant m FOLFOX6
- concurrent chemoradiotherapy
- pathologic complete response rate
- overall survival rate