徐静,瞿涛,张权,杨云平,黄烈俊,王远政
XU Jing,QIU Tao,ZHANG Quan,YANG Yunping,HUANG Liejun,WANG Yuanzheng

• 1:贵州省铜仁市人民医院创伤骨科
• 2:贵州省人民医院南明分院

摘要(Abstract)：

目的:比较经腹直肌外侧入路与髂腹股沟入路治疗髋臼骨折患者的临床疗效。方法:选取髋臼骨折患者30例,随机均分为研究组(腹直肌外侧入路)和对照组(髂腹股沟入路),比较2组患者的解剖显露时间、术前Hb、手术时间、术中出血量、术中输红悬液量、术后Hb、骨折复位优良率、术后髋关节功能及并发症发生率的差异。结果:研究组患者解剖显露时间、手术时间、术中出血量及术中输血量均低于对照组,术后Hb明显高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<005或P<001);研究组患者复位优良率和髋关节功能优良率高于对照组,手术并发症发生率明显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<005或P<0001)。结论:与髂腹股沟入路相比,腹直肌外侧入路治疗髋臼骨折具有手术时间短、术中出血少、骨折复位及术后关节功能恢复满意、并发症少等优点。
Objective: To compare the clinical effect of lateral rectus abdominis approach and ilioinguinal approach on patients with acetabular fractures.Methods: Thirty patients with acetabular fractures were randomly divided into a study group(lateral rectus abdominis approach) and a control group( ilioinguinal approach). The two groups were compared the anatomic exposure time,hemoglobin(Hb) before and after surgery, operation time, blood loss, intraoperative transfusion volumes of RBC suspension, excellent rate of fracture reduction, postoperative hip function and incidence of complications.Results: The anatomical exposure time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss and intraoperative RBC transfusion volume were lower in the study group than those in the control group(P< 0. 05), while the postoperative Hb and the excellent rate were significantly higher than those in control group(P< 0. 01 orP< 0. 05). Moreover, the incidence of surgical complications was significantly lower than that in the control group(P< 0.05 orP< 0. 001).Conclusion: The lateral rectus abdominis approach is superior to ilioinguinal approach in the treatment of patients with acetabular fracture. The lateral rectus muscle approach the iliac inguinal approach.

关键词(KeyWords)： 高能量损伤;髋臼骨折;腹直肌外侧入路;髂腹股沟入路;解剖复位;关节功能
high-energy injury;acetabular fracture;lateral rectus abdominis approach;ilioinguinal approach;anatomical reduction;joint function

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 贵州省高层次创新型人才千人计划资助项目[GZSYQCC(2015)002];; 铜仁市科技局立项课题[铜市科研(2017)47-3]

作者(Author): 徐静,瞿涛,张权,杨云平,黄烈俊,王远政
XU Jing,QIU Tao,ZHANG Quan,YANG Yunping,HUANG Liejun,WANG Yuanzheng

DOI: 10.19367/j.cnki.1000-2707.2020.02.019

参考文献(References)：

• [1]吴新宝．骨盆与髋臼骨折的评述与展望[J]．中华创伤骨科杂志，2019,21(6):461-463.
• [2] JULIUS A, MILTON L. Osseous fixation pathways in pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery:osteology, radiology,and clinical applications.[J]. The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2012,6(6):1502-1509.
• [3]刘超，李无阴，成传德，等．改良stoppa入路手术治疗骨盆、髋臼骨折[J]．中医正骨，2013,25(3):71-72.
• [4] BUSCH A, STOCKLE U, SCHREINER A, et al. Total hip arthroplasty following acetabular fracture:a clinical and radiographic outcome analysis of 67 patients[J]. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2019,9(9):1733-1726.
• [5] DYSKIN E, HILL B W, TORCHIA M T, et al. A Survey of high-and low-energy acetabular fractures in elderly patients[J]. Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery Rehabilitation,2019, 8(20):1142-1148.
• [6]徐刚，唐献忠，王嘉，等．改良stoppa入路与髂腹股沟入路手术治疗骨盆和髋臼骨折的疗效比较[J]．中国骨与关节损伤杂志，2014,29(6):521-523.
• [7]张潇，熊然，樊仕才，等．经腹直肌外侧切口入路治疗髋臼骨折的解刨学研究[J]．中国临床解刨学杂志，2015,33(1):17-20.
• [8] GUO H Z, HE Y F, HE W Q, et al. Modified stoppa approach for pelvic and acetabular fracture treatment[J].Acta Ortopedica Brasileira, 2019,27(4):216-219.
• [9]谢易，龚泰芳，李彬彬，等．腹直肌外侧切口联合K-L入路治疗复杂髋臼骨折[J]．创伤外科杂志，2018,20(11):845-847.
• [10]郑锋．经腹直肌外侧切口入路与髂腹股沟入路治疗髋臼骨折的对照研究[J]．吉林医学，2016, 37(6):1352-1354.
• [11]郭雷．改良stoppa入路在骨盆髋臼骨折中的应用[J]．中国现代药物应用，2015,9(17):62-63.
• [12]王钢．骨盆与髋臼骨折的治疗进展与评述[J]．中华创伤骨科杂志，2019,21(3):189-190.
• [13]王满宜．骨盆与髋臼骨折国内治疗现状与将来发展趋势[J]．中华创伤骨科杂志，2016,18(2):93-94
• [14]陈雁西．骨盆与髋臼骨折的诊治：走向精准医疗[J]．中华创伤杂志，2016,32(11):964-966.
• [15]王钢．骨盆与髋臼骨折的治疗进展及思考[J]．中华创伤骨科杂志，2018,20(3):185-186.
• [16]COHENLEVY W B, LIU J, SEN M, et al. Prophylactic inferior vena cava filters for operative pelvic fractures:a twelve year experience[J]. Critical Care Medicine,2015, 40(12):761-764.
• [17] STAHEL P F, MOORE E E, BURLEW C C. et al.Preperitoneal pelvic packing is not associated with an increased risk for surgical site infections after internal anterior pelvic ring fixation[J]. Journal Orthopaedic Trauma,2019,25(7):838-841.
• [18]钱荣勋，王洪震，高宜军，等．改良Stppa入路与腹股沟入路行髋臼骨折切开复位内固定术的比较[J]．实用骨科学杂志，2015,18(9):784-788.
• [19]高昆何荣新．髋臼骨折手术疗效相关因素研究[J]．中华实验外科杂志，2018, 35(12):2329.
• [20]PERKINS Z B,MAYTHAM G D, KOERS L,et al. Impact on outcome of a targeted performance improvement programme in haemodynamically unstable patients with a pelvic fracture[J]. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2014,8(8):1090-1097.
• [21]HAMMAD A S, ELKHADRAWE T A. Accuracy of reduction and ear`ly clinical outcome in acetabular fractures treated by the standard ilio-inguinal versus the Stoppa iliac approaches[J]. Injury, 2015,2(2):320-326.
• [22]王忠正，侯志勇，张英泽，等．改良髋臼骨折分型系统的可信度与可重复性评价[J]．中华创伤杂志，2019,35(8):763-768.
• [23]熊然，张潇，李涛，等．经腹直肌外侧切口入路治疗髋臼骨折合并同侧骨盆骨折[J]．中华创伤骨科杂志，2014,16(5):385-390.
• [24]崔路宽，刘浩，王树辉，等．改良腹直肌外侧切口在骨盆髋臼骨折手术治疗中的应用[J]．中国骨与关节创伤杂志，2019,34(4):436-438.
• [25]胡学峰，刘敏，胡平，等．运用腹直肌外侧入路微创治疗髋臼骨折8例体会[J]．中国矫形外科杂志，2019,26(24):2299-2301.
• [26]孙志波，杨述华，禹志宏，等．单一腹直肌外侧切口治疗骨盆前后环骨折[J]．创伤外科杂志，2018,20(2):126-128.

文章评论(Comment)：