检测补体C3、C4及C1q水平对狼疮性肾炎活动性判定的价值The Value of Detecting Complement C3,C4 and C1q Levels in Deciding of Lupus Nephritis Activity
胡小平,刘瑞菡,陈杰
HU Xiaoping,LIU Ruihan,CHEN Jie
摘要(Abstract):
目的:检测活动期和非活动期狼疮性肾炎(LN)患者血清补体C3、C4及C1q水平,探讨其对LN活动性判定的价值。方法:用免疫比浊法分别对经临床确诊的82例活动期和79例非活动期LN患者血清补体C3、C4及C1q的水平进行检测,比较两组患者C3、C4及C1q的水平及阳性检出率。结果:两组患者血清补体C3和C4的阳性检出率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),LN活动组C1q的阳性检出率(92.6%)高于LN非活动组(70.8%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);LN活动组补体C3、C4、C1q水平均较LN非活动组下降(P<0.05)。结论:LN活动期患者C1q阳性率较LN非活动期患者高,而C3、C4、C1q水平较LN非活动期患者均降低,动态监测C3、C4、C1q的水平及检测C1q阳性情况对判断LN是否处于活动期有重要意义。
Objective: To detect the serum levels of complement C3,C4 and C1q of patients with lupus nephritis( LN) in active period and inactive period,and so as to evaluate the value of them in deciding of LN activity. Methods: Immunoturbidimetry method was employed to detect serum levels of C3,C4 and C1q of 82 LN patients in active period and 79 LN patients in inactive period. Serum C3, C4 and C1q levels and their positive detection rates of the two groups were compared. Results: No significant difference was found in positive rates of C3 and C4 between the two groups( P > 0. 05),while positive rate of C1q in LN active group( 92. 6%) was significant higher than that of LN inactive group( 70. 8%)( P <0. 05). Serum levels of C3,C4 and C1q in LN active group were lower than those of LN inactive group( P < 0. 05). Conclusions: Positive rate of C1q in LN active group is significant higher than that of LN inactive group,while serum levels of C3,C4 and C1q in LN active group are lower than those of LN inactive group. Dynamic monitor of C3,C4 and C1q levels and C1q positive rate has important meaning in deciding of LN activity.
关键词(KeyWords):
狼疮肾炎;活动性;补体3;补体4;补体1q
lupus nephritis;activity;complement 3;complement 4;complement 1q
基金项目(Foundation): 湖北省自然科学基金(2011CD3324)
作者(Author):
胡小平,刘瑞菡,陈杰
HU Xiaoping,LIU Ruihan,CHEN Jie
DOI: 10.19367/j.cnki.1000-2707.2014.02.015
参考文献(References):
- [1]廖瑾岚,熊祖应,王青,等.抗C1q抗体在评价狼疮性肾炎活动性中的作用[J].国际泌尿系统杂志,2013(1):61-65.
- [2]饶沃明,陈林强,何绿茵,等.红斑狼疮患者与重叠综合征患者相关检测结果探讨[J].实验与检验医学,2009(4):343-344.
- [3]王柳.自身抗体在狼疮肾炎中的作用机制[J].医学综述,2013(14):2533-2535.
- [4]傅淑霞,段建召,张丽萍,等.免疫球蛋白及补体C3对肾小球疾病诊断的临床意义[J].临床荟萃,2010(19):2533-2535.
- [5]王康,郑学,戴勇,等.HnRNP A2/B1在系统性红斑狼疮患者中表达的临床观察[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2013(15):1169-1170,1173.
- [6]郭欣,徐兆珍,李晓光,等.抗核抗体、免疫球蛋白及补体联合检测对狼疮性肾炎的诊断意义[J].国际检验医学杂志,2011(14):1565-1568.
- [7]王娟,郭桂梅,何威逊,等.儿童系统性红斑狼疮100例[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2012(21):1660-1662.
- [8]吴春林.肾病患者免疫球蛋白、补体、白蛋白、血脂与肾脏病理的关系[J].检验医学,2013(5):370-373.
- [9]陈春华,王丽.联检抗C1q抗体、ds-DNA、抗-核小体、抗Sm、ANA在狼疮性肾炎中的临床意义[J].放射免疫学杂志,2009(5):545.
- [10]沈姗.ICAM-1和VCAM-1在系统性红斑狼疮患者尿液中的表达水平及其临床意义[D].苏州:苏州大学,2013.
文章评论(Comment):
|
||||||||||||||||||
|