程树强,夏曙华,印琳,彭晓枫
CHENG Shuqiang,XIA Shuhua,YIN Lin,PENG Xiaofeng

• 1:贵州医科大学临检科
• 2:贵州医科大学检验系

摘要(Abstract)：

目的:探究男性泌尿生殖道炎症与加德纳菌(GV)感染关系。方法:用革兰染色法对127例前列腺炎(前列腺炎组)、29例泌尿道感染(泌尿道感染组)、66例其它前列腺疾病患者(其他前列腺疾病组)及33例正常男性(对照组)的前列腺液或尿沉渣标本进行GV初筛,对筛检出的GV阳性标本进行GV特异性荧光抗体染色复查,比较2种方法的GV检出率及不同分组间GV阳性检出率。结果:2种染色方法对同一组样本的GV阳性检出率比较,荧光抗体染色法均低于革兰染色法,在前列腺炎组和其他前列腺疾病组差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);革兰染色GV检出阳性率由高至低依次为泌尿道感染组、前列腺炎组、其他前列腺疾病组、对照组,组间比较,差异有统计意义(P<0.05);荧光抗体染色法GV阳性检出率由高至低依次为泌尿道感染组、前列腺炎组、对照组、其他前列腺疾病组,泌尿道感染组、前列腺炎组和对照组(或其他前列腺组)组间两两比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),其他前列腺疾病组与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:革兰染色法检测GV存在一定假阳性,前列腺炎、泌尿道感染可能与GV感染有关。
Objective: To investigate the relationship between Gardnerella vaginalis( GV) and male genitourinary inflammation. Methods: Gram staining was used to detect GV in prostatic fluid or urinary sediment of 127 patients with prostatitis( prostatitis group),29 patients with urinary tract infection( urinary tract infection group),66 patients with other prostate disease( other prostate disease group)and 33 normal male( normal control group). Then specific immunofluorescent antibody technique was used to recheck positive results of gram stain and GV positive rates were compared between four groups by above-mentioned methods. Results: For the samples in the same experimental group,the GV positive rates detected by specific immunofluorescent antibody staining were generally lower than those by gram staining,and the results were statistically significant in prostatitis group and other prostate disease group( P < 0. 01). The positive rates detected by gram staining in urinary tract infection group was highest,followed by in prostatitis group,in other prostate disease group and in normal control group,and the differences between each group were statistically significant( P < 0. 05). The positive rates detected by fluorescent antibody staining in urinary tract infection group was highest,followed by in prostatitis group,in normal control group and in other prostate disease group,and the differences between urinary tract infection group prostatitis group,and normal control group( other prostate disease group)were statistically significant( P < 0. 05) but the differences between normal control group and other prostate disease group were not statistically significant( P > 0. 05). Conclusion: There exists some false positives in detecting GV by gram staining method. Prostatitis and urinary tract infection might be related to GV infection.

关键词(KeyWords)： 加德纳菌;炎症;泌尿生殖系统;GV荧光抗体染色;革兰染色
Gardnerella vaginalis;inflammation;urinary and reproductive system;GV immunofluo-rescent antibody staining;gram staining

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 程树强,夏曙华,印琳,彭晓枫
CHENG Shuqiang,XIA Shuhua,YIN Lin,PENG Xiaofeng

DOI: 10.19367/j.cnki.1000-2707.2015.10.022

参考文献(References)：

• [1]夏曙华,杨正安,胡官林,等.353例男性泌尿生殖道疾病患者加德纳菌的检测[J].中华皮肤科杂志,2000(3):188.
• [2]Tang S,Lin HX,Gong HT.Method establishment and clinical performance evaluation of immunofluorescence assay for gardnerella vaginalis[J].Energy Procedia,2012(2):1805-1810.
• [3]叶应妩,王毓三,申子瑜.全国临床检验操作规程[M].3版.北京:东南大学出版社,2006:275-753.
• [4]蓝玉清,陆奉科,闭雄杰.直接免疫荧光法在阴道加德纳菌感染诊断中的应用研究[J].国际检验医学杂志,2013(18):2437-2439.
• [5]罗国忠,曾伟敏.85例慢性前列腺炎病原检测及药敏分析[J].医学信息,2010(10):273-274.
• [6]李文郎,陈爱华,黄华泥.男性尿路感染病原菌分布及耐药性分析[J].国际检验医学杂志,2010(31):689-690.
• [7]李彩青,刘金禄,明秀峰,等.阴道加德纳菌在细菌性前列腺炎感染中的意义[J].现代检验医学杂志,2010(5):127-128.
• [8]Kumar B,Sharma M.Carriage of gardnerella vaginalis in theurethra of Indian men[J].Indian Journal of Medical Research,1994(2):252-254.
• [9]李采青,祁进龙,刘金禄,等.男性尿路感染患者阴道加德纳菌DNA检测[J].河北北方学院学报,2006(5):33-34.
• [10]金新德,王飞儿,金波.男性尿道分泌物1314份病原谱分析[J].中国皮肤性病学杂志,2013(2):174-176.

文章评论(Comment)：