贵阳市居民对健康城市建设满意率及需求分析Analysis on the Satisfaction Rate and Demand of Residents about Healthy City Construction in Guiyang
刘海燕,汪俊华,汪小斌,唐梅
LIU Haiyan,WANG Junhua,WANG Xiaobin,TANG Mei
摘要(Abstract)：
目的:了解和分析贵阳市居民对健康城市建设的满意率及需求。方法:采用分层随机抽样方法,运用自制电子问卷对贵阳市3 164名居民进行调查,内容涉及6大类17项指标,分析各单项指标的满意率及总满意率,调查居民对建设健康城市的需求和存在的问题。结果:被调查人群对健康城市建设的总满意率为84.4%,对城市管理类满意率最高(89.2%),对交通管理类满意率最低(78.8%),差异有统计学意义(χ~2=431.699,P<0.001);居民对不同类别指标的单项满意率不同,差异有统计学意义(χ~2=1 099.266,P<0.001),满意率较高的为园林绿化、城市规划及文化建设,分别为92.8%、90.9%及90.7%,满意率较低的为交通状况、食品安全及居民素养,分别为73.9%、76.6%及78.4%;居民最期望改善的方面为社会文明程度(72.5%)、居住环境(71.5%)及食品卫生(71.2%);调查对象认为贵阳市健康城市建设下一步需要加强的最主要问题是"食品安全卫生"(44.7%)。结论:居民对贵阳市健康城市建设的多个方面满意率较高,但也期望进一步改善交通、食品安全及居住环境,提高居民素养。
Objective: To investigate and analyze the satisfaction rate and demand of the residents for healthy city construction in Guiyang,China. Methods: Stratified random sampling method was adopted to investigate the satisfaction rate and demand of 3,164 residents in the healthy city construction of Guiyang with self-designed electronic questionnaires, and the difference of residents' satisfaction rate was compared with χ~2 test. Results: The total satisfaction rate of Guiyang residents for healthy city construction was 84.4%. They had the highest satisfaction rate for urban management(89.2%) and the lowest satisfaction rate for traffic management(78.8%), and the difference was statistically significant(χ~2=431.699,P<0.001). Among them, higher satisfaction rates came to landscaping, urban planning and cultural construction(92.8%, 90.9% and 90.7%). Traffic conditions, food safety and residents' literacy were 73.9%, 76.6% and 78.4%,with statistically significant differences(χ~2=1 099.266,P<0.001). The aspects that residents most expected to improve included improvement of social civilization(72.5%), improvement of living environment(71.5%) and greater confidence in food hygiene(71.2%). According to the respondents, " food safety and hygiene" was the most important issue to be strengthened in the next step of healthy city construction in Guiyang(44.7%). Conclusion: In the construction of healthy city of Guiyang, lower satisfaction rates of the residents point to the transportation, food safety, living environment and residents' quality, and these are the expectation of improvement and their greater demand.
关键词(KeyWords)：
贵阳市;居民;健康城市;满意率;改善;需求
Guiyang;residents;healthy city construction;satisfaction rate;improvement;demand
基金项目(Foundation): 贵阳市健康城市建设理论研究及业务培训项目[GYZXYG-2017-12-635-GY-G公(C99)]
作者(Author):
刘海燕,汪俊华,汪小斌,唐梅
LIU Haiyan,WANG Junhua,WANG Xiaobin,TANG Mei
DOI: 10.19367/j.cnki.1000-2707.2019.12.012
参考文献(References)：
- [1] 夏娟,王继伟,余金明.第九届全球健康促进大会:健康城市专题解读[J].健康教育与健康促进,2017,12(1):12-14.
- [2] 唐琼,李忠阳,李光耀,等.上海市建设健康城市行动的实践与发展[J].上海预防医学,2016,28(1):7-14.
- [3] 马琳,董亮,郑英.“健康城市”在中国的发展与思考[J].医学与哲学,2017,38(3):5-8.
- [4] YANG J,SIRI J G,REMAIS J V,et al.The Tsinghua-Lancet commission on healthy cities in China:unlocking the power of cities for a healthy China[J].Lancet,2018,391(10135):2140-2184.
- [5] 骆湘香,许鸣,谢文倩,等.浙江省3个市区居民对健康城市建设满意程度与需求分析[J].现代医药卫生,2016,32(8):1159-1163.
- [6] 郑静,凌莉,张福林,等.住院病人满意度影响因素调查分析[J].中国医院统计,2004,11(3):210-215.
- [7] 陈钊娇,蓝剑楠,单蔚,等.杭州居民健康城市建设参与现状及对策研究[J].健康研究,2011,31(3):203-206.
- [8] 韩铁光,黄映翠,杨国安,等.某市市民健康城市建设认知和需求评价[J].中国医药指南,2012,10(17):403-404.
- [9] 朱莹莹,梅秋红,丁十戈,等.宁波市居民健康素养与健康城市满意度调查[J].预防医学,2019,31(1):38-41.
- [10]蒙水,汪平,高小于.“数说”贵阳市创建国家食品安全示范城市[J].中国食品药品监管,2018,(4):77-78.
- [11]武娟妮,孙宁,姚梦茵.贵阳城市环境功能定位研究[J].环境保护科学,2017,43(5):11-16.
- [12]艾希,宋雨桐.智慧城市建设下居民对公共服务的需求分析———以贵阳市智慧交通建设为例[J].产业与科技论坛,2019,18(14):77-80.
- [13]刘茜.交通拥堵对贵阳市城市品牌建设的影响[J].商品与质量,2014,(4):330.
- [14]傅华,戴俊明,高俊岭,等.健康城市建设与展望[J].中国公共卫生,2019,35(10):1285-1288.
文章评论(Comment)：
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||