贾文鹏,郭团茂
JIA Wenpeng,GUO Tuanmao

• 1:富平县医院
• 2:咸阳市中心医院骨科

摘要(Abstract)：

目的:探讨椎间融合器(cage)植骨融合对多节段脊髓型颈椎病患者的治疗效果。方法:将多节段脊髓型颈椎病患者90例均分成对照组和观察组,对照组行传统钛板固定术,观察组行cage植骨融合术,观察两组术前1 d及术后6个月时的脊髓功能、椎间高度及颈椎曲度;采用颈椎功能障碍指数量表(NDI)对颈椎功能(颈椎疼痛、提物、集中注意力、生活能力、睡眠、头疼)6个条目予以评估,并分析并发症发生率。结果:观察组脊髓功能恢复优良率高于对照组,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后6个月的椎间高度、颈椎曲度高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后6个月的颈椎疼痛、提物、头疼评分低于对照组,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后并发症发生率与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:cage植骨融合术能促进多节段脊髓型颈椎病患者颈椎曲度的恢复,减轻颈脊髓功能障碍。
Objective: To investigate the effect of bone graft fusion with interbody fusion cage on patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Methods: 90 cases with cervical spondylotic myelopathy were randomly divided into the control group( n = 45) and the observation group( n =45). In the control group,the traditional titanium plate fixation was performed. And the observation group received bone graft fusion with interbody fusion cage. The spinal cord recovery effect and intervertebral height and cervical curvature change of both groups 1 d before operation and 6 months after operation. The cervical vertebral function was assessed by the neck disability index scale( NDI),and the incidence of complications was analyzed. Results: The recovery excellent rate of spinal cord function in the observation group was 93. 33%,higher than that of the control group( 77. 78%),and there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups( P < 0. 05). The intervertebral height and cervical curvature of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group 6 months after operation( P < 0. 05). The scores of cervical pain,extraction and headache in the observation group 6 months after operation was lower than that in the control group,and there was a significant difference between the two groups( P < 0. 05). The complication rate of the observation group was 4. 44%,and it was 11. 11% in the control group,without statistical significance( P >0. 05). Conclusion: Bone graft fusion with interbody fusion cage can promote the recovery of cervical curvature of patients with multiple segments of cervical spondylosis,and reduce the dysfunction of cervical vertebra.

关键词(KeyWords)： 颈椎病;椎间融合器;颈椎曲度;颈椎功能障碍;并发症;钛板固定术
cervical spondylosis;interbody fusion cage;cervical curvature;cervical dysfunction;complications;titanium plate fixation

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 陕西省卫生计生委项目(2016D071)

作者(Author): 贾文鹏,郭团茂
JIA Wenpeng,GUO Tuanmao

DOI: 10.19367/j.cnki.1000-2707.2018.07.022

参考文献(References)：

• [1]唐少龙,黄庆华,吴罗根,等.两种后路内固定结合单开门手术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的近期疗效比较[J].临床骨科杂志,2016,19(3):257-261.
• [2]Rd M C S,MARASCAALCHI B J,PASSIAS P G,et al.Impact of race and insurance status on surgical approach for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in the united states:A population-based Analysis[J].Spine,2017,42(3):186-194.
• [3]MURPHY R K,SUN P,XU J,et al.Magnetic resonance imaging biomarker of axon loss reflects cervical spondylotic myelopathy severity[J].Spine,2016,41(9):751-756.
• [4]金成春,鲍广全,徐宏光.颈前路减压椎间融合器植骨融合术治疗单节段脊髓型颈椎病临床观察[J].山东医药,2017,57(16):64-66.
• [5]黄国付.实用颈椎病康复指南[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2012.
• [6]张一龙,周非非,孙宇,等.脊髓型颈椎病手术治疗后的近中期JOA评分变化规律[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2015,25(1):13-17.
• [7]伍少玲,马超,伍时玲,等.颈椎功能障碍指数量表的效度与信度研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2008,23(7):625-628.
• [8]李会明,夏刚,田融.两种颈前路减压重建术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的疗效比较[J].中华实验外科杂志,2016,33(5):1409-1411.
• [9]庄超,周栋,汤雪明,等.颈前路零切迹椎间融合内固定系统治疗脊髓型颈椎病的疗效分析[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2015,29(6):751-755.
• [10]李秀茅,姜亮,刘忠军.一期前后联合入路手术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病研究进展[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2016,26(2):171-175.
• [11]许良,孔鹏,徐展望.颈前路椎体次全切减压钛网植骨融合联合钛板固定治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病[J].中国骨伤,2016,29(3):211-215.
• [12]许艺荠,张雪松,孙太存,等.新型Zero-P与cage钛板椎间融合器修复颈椎病:早期稳定性对比[J].中国组织工程研究,2016,20(22):3227-3234.
• [13]梁英杰,尹庆水,张光明,等.颈椎前路椎间融合器植入术治疗脊髓型颈椎病22例疗效分析[J].中华显微外科杂志,2015,38(3):287-289.
• [14]杨林,赵新建,曾志超,等.椎间融合器与自体髂骨在颈椎前路椎间植骨融合术中的疗效比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2016,31(7):722-724.
• [15]周仕国,徐杰,刘春华,等.颈前路单cage植骨融合联合钢板内固定治疗无骨折脱位颈脊髓损伤[J].临床骨科杂志,2016,19(4):385-387.
• [16]王经宇,董玉珍,孙晓辉,等.零切迹椎间融合器植入治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病[J].中国组织工程研究,2017,21(27):4300-4305..
• [17]张儒,赵凤东,范顺武,等.前路选择性椎体切除分节段减压植骨融合术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病[J].临床医学工程,2016,23(1):837-841.
• [18]谢斌华,李青.颈椎损伤并发脊髓损伤的预后及影响因素分析[J].贵州医科大学学报,2017,42(1):81-85.
• [19]唐勇,贾治伟,吴剑宏,等.脊髓型颈椎病预后相关因素的研究进展[J].中国骨伤,2016,29(3):216-219.
• [20]徐灿华,吴增晖,郑轶,等.3种不同椎间融合固定方式治疗脊髓型颈椎病的疗效对比[J].重庆医学,2015,44(31):4345-4348.

文章评论(Comment)：