陈明江
CHEN Mingjiang

• 1:兴义市人民医院影像科

摘要(Abstract)：

目的:观察传统子宫输卵管造影(HSG)方法和改良HSG方法在对比剂逆流发生中的差异。方法:2 143例子宫输卵管造影检查患者,71例采用传统HSG,2 072例采用改良HSG,比较两种造影方法发生对比剂逆流的病例数、逆流程度特征。结果:传统HSG发生逆流8例(11.27%),显著逆流7例(9.86%),轻微逆流1例(1.41%);改良HSG发生逆流68例(3.28%),显著逆流18例(0.87%),轻微逆流50例(2.41%);改良HSG逆流发生率低于传统HSG,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:改良HSG可明显降低对比剂逆流的发生率。
Objective: To observe the difference between conventional hysterosalpingography( HSG)and the improved method of hysterosalpingography in contrast agent reflux. Methods: 2 143 cases of hysterosalpingography were analyzed,71 cases were treated with conventional HSG,2 072 cases with improved HSG. The number of cases and the degree of contrast characteristics of countercurrent reflux of two methods were compared. Results: Conventional HSG occurred refluzx in 8 cases( 11. 27%),significant reflux in 7 cases( 9. 86%),mild reflux in 1 case( 1. 41%),improved HSG occurred reflux in 68 cases( 3. 28%),significant reflux in 18 cases( 0. 87%),mild reflux in 50 cases( 2. 41%). Conclusion: The improved HSG can significantly reduce the incidence rate of contrast agent reflux,and the significant reflux incidence rate is low.

关键词(KeyWords)： 子宫输卵管造影术;造影剂;逆流;改良
Improved method;conventional method;Hysterosalpingography(HSG);Contrast agent reflux

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 贵州省黔西南州科技计划项目(2015-2-08)

作者(Author): 陈明江
CHEN Mingjiang

DOI: 10.19367/j.cnki.1000-2707.2016.05.022

参考文献(References)：

• [1]乐杰.妇产科学[M].7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:352.
• [2]白人驹.医学影像诊断学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:572-575.
• [3]李亚敏,李俊.子宫输卵管造影逆流的征象分析[J].实用医技杂志,2014(5):481-482.
• [4]Silberzweig JE,Khorsandi AS,Caldon M,et al.Gadolinium for hysterosalpingography[J].J Reprod Med,2008(1):15-19.
• [5]袁秀林.子宫输卵管造影术中对比剂逆流的临床分析[J].医药前沿,2015(4):62-63.
• [6]容毅霜,兰凤婉.子宫输卵管造影对比剂逆流的影响学表现及临床分析[J].右江医学,2013(4):571-572.

文章评论(Comment)：