潘攀,邹涛,汤稳权,王加好
PAN Pan,ZOU Tao,TANG Wenquan,WANG Jiahao

• 1:贵州医科大学医学心理学教研室
• 2:贵州医科大学
• 3:云阳县人民医院

摘要(Abstract)：

目的:评估简化乌德勒支应对方式量表中文版本(UCL-14)的信效度及其在大学生中的使用。方法:用UCL-19进行预测,经过探索性因子分析删减修改量表为UCL-14,再用UCL-14对480名大学生进行检测,1月后从原样本中随机抽取145个样本重测,用认知情绪调节问卷(CERQ)、社交性应激反应问卷(RSQSSV)为效标,评估与抑郁症状的相关性。结果:最终中文版简化UCL-14总量表Cronbach a系数为0.78,各分量表的a系数在0.63~0.77之间;总量表重测信度0.84,分量表的重测信度在0.71~0.82之间;验证性因子分析显示数据拟合良好,具有较好的结构效度。结论:简化乌德勒支应对方式量表中文版具有较好的信效度,可以用于大学生的应对方式测量。
Objective: To assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Utrecht Coping List-14( UCL-14) and its application in university. Methods: UCL-19 was modified as UCL-14 through the exploratory factor analysis and deletion,and UCL-14 was adopted to survey 480 college students. One month later,145 samples were randomly extracted from original samples( n = 145) and resurveyed. The CERQ and RSQ-SSV were adopted as criterion to assess the correlation with depressive symptoms. Results: The internal consistency reliability coefficient of total scale was 0. 78 while those of three subscales ranged from 0. 63 ~ 0. 77. The test-retest reliability coefficient of total scale was 0. 84 while those of three subscales ranged from 0. 71 ~ 0. 82. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that UCL-14 had good data fitting and construct validity. Conclusion: Chinese version of simplified Utrecht Coping List has good reliability and validity,and can be applied to coping style measurement for college students.

关键词(KeyWords)： 应对;简化乌德勒支应对方式量表;信度;效度;抑郁
coping style;Utrecht Coping List;reliability;validity;depression

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 贵州省科学技术基金项目(No:RT2013—2014)

作者(Author): 潘攀,邹涛,汤稳权,王加好
PAN Pan,ZOU Tao,TANG Wenquan,WANG Jiahao

DOI: 10.19367/j.cnki.1000-2707.2015.07.012

参考文献(References)：

• [1]Berend T,Willem VR,Wilmar B.Schaufelis and Marten DE Haan.The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire(4DSQ):measuring distress and other mental health problems in a working population[J].WORK&STRESS,2004(3):187-207.
• [2]Sanderman R,Ormel J.De Utrechtse Coping Lijst(UCL):validiteit en betrouwbaarheid[The Utrecht Coping List(UCL):validity and reliability][J].Gedrag Gezondh,1992(20):32–70.
• [3]朱熊兆.认知情绪调节问卷中文版的信效度研究[J].中国临床心理杂志,2007(2):121-124.
• [4]肖晶.社交性应激反应问卷中文版在大学生中应用的信效度初步评价[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2008(10):775-780.
• [5]吴明隆.SPSS统计应用实务——问卷分析与应用统计[M].科学出版社,2003:75-76.
• [6]Anja C.Huizink,Coping in Normal Pregnancy[J].Ann Behav Med,2002(2):132-140.
• [7]J.Caroline D.Biopsychosocial Mediators and Moderators of Stress-Health Relationships in Patients With Recently Diagnosed Rheumatoid Arthritis[J].Arthritis care&Research,2001(45):307-316.
• [8]贾茹,吴任刚.亲密关系冲突应对方式量表的修订及信效度检验[J].精神医学杂志,2012(4):241-244.
• [9]Marc,Van,Essen.Competition and Cooperation in Corporate Governance:The Effects of Labor Institutions on Blockholder Effectiveness in 23 European Countries[J].Organization Science,2013(2):530-551.
• [10]Willem VR.Coping and sickness absence[J].Int Arch Occup Environ Health,2008(81):461-472.
• [11]姚娜.应对方式理论的研究发展综述[J].西北大学学报.2011(9):9.
• [12]Sesar,Kimi N,Bari M.Multi-type childhood abuse,strategies of coping,and psychological adaptions in young adults[J].Croation Medical Journal,2010(5):406-416.
• [13]Floor,Aarts.Coping Style as a Mediator between Attachment and Mental and Physical Health in Patients Suffering from Morbid Obesity[J].The International Journal of Psychi in Med,2014(1):75-91.
• [14]王极盛、丁新华.中学生抑郁与其相关影响因素的综合研究[J]中国学校卫生,2003(4):336-338.
• [15]Mario M.Interpersonal psychotherapy for postpartum depression:a systematic review[J].Arch Womens Ment Health,2014(17):257-268.
• [16]Hannah,Turner.A Psychometric Evaluation of an English Version of the Utrecht Coping List[J].European Eating Disorders Review,2012(4):339-342.

文章评论(Comment)：