贵州医科大学学报

2018, v.43;No.213(06) 667-669

[打印本页] [关闭]
本期目录(Current Issue) | 过刊浏览(Past Issue) | 高级检索(Advanced Search)

伴肝门淋巴结转移乙肝相关性肝细胞癌患者不同疗法生存差异分析
A Comparison of Overall Survival Difference of Different Treatment on Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Perihilar Lymph Node Metastases

朱海涛;
ZHU Haitao;Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery,Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University;

摘要(Abstract):

目的:分析乙肝相关肝癌伴肝门淋巴结患者行肝癌切除+肝门淋巴结清扫、动脉化疗栓塞术(TAE)及未行治疗患者生存率的差异。方法:乙肝相关肝癌伴肝门淋巴结转移患者32例,其中17例患者行肝癌切除+肝门淋巴结清扫,5例患者行TAE治疗,而有10例患者未行治疗,比较3组患者生存率。结果:肝癌切除+肝门淋巴结清扫患者及TAE患者生存率优于未行治疗组患者(P<0.05),而肝癌切除+肝门淋巴结清扫患者与TAE患者生存率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:肝癌切除+肝门淋巴结清扫术与TAE术均能延长患者生存期。
Objective: To investigate the overall survival rate difference among radical resection,TAE and without any treatment on hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma with perihilar lymph node metastases. Methods: 32 patients with HBV-related HCC with perihilar lymph node metastases,17 were performed radical resection,5 were performed TAE and no treatment was given to 10 of them. Overall survival( OS) rates were analyzed in all groups. Results: The OS in both radical resection and TAE groups were better than no treatment group respectively( P < 0. 05),and there was no significant difference of OS between radical group and TAE group. Conclusions: TAE and radical resection could both prolong patients overall survival.

关键词(KeyWords): 原发性肝癌;淋巴结转移;动脉化疗栓塞术;乙型肝炎;肝切除
hepatocellular carcinoma;lymph node metastases;transarterial chemoembolization;hepatitis B virus;liver resection

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 贵州省科研计划项目[黔科合LH字(2016)7232];; 贵阳医学院附属医院博士启动基金

作者(Author): 朱海涛;
ZHU Haitao;Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery,Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University;

Email:

DOI: 10.19367/j.cnki.1000-2707.2018.06.009

参考文献(References):

文章评论(Comment):

序号(No.) 时间(Time) 反馈人(User) 邮箱(Email) 标题(Title) 内容(Content)
反馈人(User) 邮箱地址(Email)
反馈标题(Title)
反馈内容(Content)
扩展功能
本文信息
服务与反馈
本文关键词相关文章
本文作者相关文章
中国知网
分享