郭浩冉,罗虹
GUO Haoran,LUO Hong

• 1:贵州医科大学公共卫生学院

摘要(Abstract)：

目的:探讨在民办学校中开展不同类型卫生习惯健康教育干预的效果。方法:将贵阳市3所民办小学5、6年级266名小学生随机分为3组,Ⅰ组仅发放卫生习惯知识宣传资料让学生自行阅读,Ⅱ组仅通过上卫生习惯知识健康教育课进行干预,Ⅲ组结合上课和发放宣传资料两种教育方式干预,计算并比较干预前后学生卫生习惯知识知晓率和卫生习惯行为正确率。结果:Ⅲ组学生的卫生习惯知识知晓率、行为正确率较Ⅰ组和Ⅱ组均有所提高,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);其中Ⅲ组学生卫生习惯提高幅度最大,知识知晓率和行为正确率分别提高了21.32%和23.30%;其次为Ⅱ学生,分别提高了16.20%和19.89%;而Ⅰ组学生提高幅度最小,分别提高了9.08%和9.20%。结论:贵阳市民办小学高年级学生卫生习惯健康教育干预效果较好,尤以上课结合发放宣传资料的干预效果为佳。
Objective: To investigate the effect of different hygiene health education methods in private school. Methods: Take the stratified cluster random sampling method,only upper grade students in three private primary schools in Guiyang as the research objects,and randomly set up three intervention groups,use the different ways( reading,class and reading combine with class) to educate the dietary knowledge in intervention group,then analyzing the effect of diet health education. Results: After the health education intervention,the rates of health habits knowledge,behavior accuracy in intervention groups both improved,especially the intervention group that take the way of combine class and issuing publicity materials,the rates of health habits knowledge and behavior accuracy increased by21. 32% and 23. 30% respectively; the class group follow,the rates are increased by 16. 20 % and19. 89% respectively; the least is reading group,the rates are increased by 9. 08% and 9. 20% respectively,differences are statistically significant( P < 0. 05). Conclusion: The effect of senior student hygiene health education intervention in Guiyang private primary school are significant,especially in classroom propaganda education combine with issue publicity materials has the most significant effect,which should be spreaded.

关键词(KeyWords)： 卫生教育;干预性研究;民办学校;小学生
health education;intervention study;private primary school;pupil

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 郭浩冉,罗虹
GUO Haoran,LUO Hong

DOI: 10.19367/j.cnki.1000-2707.2016.08.014

参考文献(References)：

• [1]田子颖,郭海健,李小宁,等.民工子弟健康知识的健康教育效果评价及模式研究[J].中国全科医学,2011(28):3271-3274.
• [2]潘丽莉,张红梅,赖建强,等.北京和上海3~5岁儿童饮食行为干预效果的研究[J].卫生研究,2012(2):220-224.
• [3]何梅英,丁可,李小勇,等.流动儿童伤害干预效果评价[J].浙江预防医学,2011(3):22-23.
• [4]季成叶.现代儿童少年卫生学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:459.
• [5]刘敏,何井华,邢誉.营养教育对护生营养知识、态度及饮食行为影响[J].现代医院,2010(8):153-154.
• [6]赵伟明,李吴萍,陶秀娟,等.营养教育对学生饮食行为及营养状况的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2011(12):1780-1782.
• [7]张丹妮,曾顺霞,周端,等.湖北省武汉市学龄前儿童卫生习惯健康教育效果评价[J].中国健康教育,2012(9):737-740.
• [8]高春梅,杜亚平.流动儿童保健现状及其影响因素研究进展[J].中国全科医学,2013(9):967-970.
• [9]田丁,牛建军,沈锟臻,等.厦门市居民健康素养干预效果评价[J].健康教育与健康促进,2012(3):168-170.

文章评论(Comment)：