牟俊,王波
MU Jun,WANG Bo

• 1:贵州医科大学
• 2:贵州医科大学附院影像科

摘要(Abstract)：

目的:探讨应用多排螺旋CTA图像后处理技术测量颈动脉分叉角几何学指标的价值。方法:收集行多排螺旋CT头颈部血管成像没有明显异常的受检者350例,根据TF-AHCB模型颈动脉分叉角分为Ⅰ、Ⅱ及Ⅲ型组;利用医学图像后处理软件测量颈动脉分叉角(α)、颈总动脉远端内径(A)、颈内动脉膨大近端内径(B)、颈内动脉膨大处内径(C)、颈内动脉膨大远端内径(D)及颈外动脉内径(E)6项指标,观察受检者不同性别及左右侧颈总动脉这6项指标的变化。结果:Ⅰ型α(24.70±11.17)°、A(6.25±0.97)mm、B(6.12±1.42)mm、C(6.81±1.39)mm、D(4.03±0.81)mm、E(3.39±0.97)mm,Ⅱ型α(40.71±15.55)°、A(6.68±0.97)mm、B(6.70±1.41)mm、C(7.82±3.36)mm、D(4.25±0.82)mm、E(3.29±0.75)mm,Ⅲ型α(65.03±16.95)°、A(6.84±1.07)mm、B(7.27±1.78)mm、C(7.82±1.47)mm、D(4.28±0.81)mm、E(3.35±0.85)mm;Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ型颈动脉分叉角除E值外均有明显差异(P<0.05),其中α值呈线性正相关;Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ型左右侧颈动脉分叉角6项指标均无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论:多排螺旋CTA图像后处理技术提供颈动脉分叉角较为可靠的正常参考值。不同分型间颈动脉分叉角呈线性正相关。
Objective: To measure the geometry index of carotid artery bifurcation angle by multislice spiral CTA( CT angiography) imaging. Methods: 350 cases of patients who had been screened by multi-slice spiral CTA on the head and neck without any obvious abnormality were collected. Then they were divided into typeⅠand typeⅡ and type Ⅲ groups according to TF-AHCB model. The post processing software of medical image was adopted to measure the geometry index of carotid artery bifurcation angle,including the carotid artery bifurcation angle( α),the distal inner diameter of the common carotid artery( A),the proximal inner diameter of the internal carotid artery enlargement area( B),the width of the internal carotid artery enlargement area( C),the distal inner diameter of the internal carotid artery enlargement area( D),and the inner diameter of the external carotid artery( E).These 6 indicators were observed and compared between different gender and between left side and right side carotid artery. Results: The geometry factors of type Ⅰ were as follows: α( 24. 70 ±11. 17) °,A( 6. 25 ± 0. 97) mm,B( 6. 12 ± 1. 42) mm,C( 6. 81 ± 1. 39) mm,D( 4. 03 ± 0. 81)mm,E( 3. 39 ± 0. 97) mm; The geometry factors of type Ⅱwere as follows: α( 40. 71 ± 15. 55) °,A( 6. 68 ± 0. 97) mm,B( 6. 70 ± 1. 41) mm,C( 7. 82 ± 3. 36) mm,D( 4. 25 ± 0. 82) mm,E( 3. 29± 0. 75) mm; The geometry factors of type Ⅲ were as follows: α( 65. 03 ± 16. 95) °,A( 6. 84 ±1. 07) mm,B( 7. 27 ± 1. 78) mm,C( 7. 82 ± 1. 47) mm,D( 4. 28 ± 0. 81) mm,E( 3. 35 ± 0. 85)mm. The carotid artery bifurcation angle between type I,II and III were significantly different( P <0. 05),and adjusted R( 0. 370) exhibited positive linear correlation. Compared with women,6 geometry indexes of carotid artery bifurcation angle in type I and type II and B,C,D,E in type III were significantly higher( P < 0. 05). There was no significant difference in α and A of the type III between different sex( P > 0. 05). There were no significant differences in 6 indexes of type I,II and III between different sides( P > 0. 05). Conclusion: Multi-slice spiral CTA imaging can provide relatively reliable normal reference value of carotid artery bifurcation angle,and different types of carotid artery bifurcation angle exhibit positive linear correlation.

关键词(KeyWords)： 颈动脉分叉角;几何学指标测量;颈动脉分型;CT血管造影
common carotid artery bifurcation angle;geometric indexes;type of carotid bifurcation;multi-slice spiral CT angiography

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 牟俊,王波
MU Jun,WANG Bo

DOI: 10.19367/j.cnki.1000-2707.2016.04.019

参考文献(References)：

• [1]Ding Z,Wang K,Li J,et al.Flow field and oscillatory shear stress in a tuning-fork-shaped model of the average human carotid bifurcation[J].Journal of Biomechanics,2001(12):1555-1562.
• [2]Malek AM,Alper SL,Izumo S.Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis[J].JAMA,1999(21):2035-2042.
• [3]Friedman MH,Deters OJ,Mark FF,et al.Arterial geometry affects hemodynamics:a potential risk factor for atherosclerosis[J].Atherosclerosis,1983(2):225-231.
• [4]王绍波,吕梁,李鹏,等.颈动脉分叉特征与动脉粥样硬化相关性分析[J].实用放射学杂志,2011(11):1648-1651.
• [5]丁祖荣,王克强.人颈动脉分叉的TF-AHCB模型[J].上海交通大学学报,2002(1):87-90.
• [6]Yeom E,Nam KH,Jin C,et al.3D reconstruction of a carotid bifurcation from 2D transversal ultrasound images[J].Ultrasonics,2014(8):2184-2192.
• [7]Krejza J,Arkuszewski M,Kasner SE,et al.Carotid artery diameter in men and women and the relation to body and neck size[J].Stroke,2006(4):1103-1105.
• [8]杨晓燕,胡元明,魏玮,等.64层螺旋CT血管造影及超声造影评价颈动脉斑块[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2012(6):472-474,480.
• [9]杨毓雯,李沿江,谢天.高频超声评价颈动脉管壁形态对冠心病的预测价值[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2012(8):607-610.
• [10]王心宇.颈动脉超声对糖尿病患者颈动脉测量的分析研究[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2012(2):186-187.
• [11]Cinthio M,Jansson T,Eriksson A,et al.Evaluation of an algorithm for arterial lumen diameter measurements by means of ultrasound[J].Medical&Biological Engineering&Computing,2010(11):1133-1140.
• [12]王勇,王庆军,蔡剑鸣,等.MRI斜矢状位T1W黑血序列测量颈动脉分叉角的可行性研究[J].南方医科大学学报,2013(1):93-98.
• [13]段少银,林长华,荆晶,等.颈动脉分叉部的三维CT血管成像解剖测量[J].中国组织工程研究,2013(15):2735-2742.
• [14]Thomas JB,Antiga L,Che SL,et al.Variation in the carotid bifurcation geometry of young versus older adults implications for geometric risk of atherosclerosis[J].Stroke,2005(11):2450-2456.
• [15]俞同福,王德杭,冯阳,等.多排螺旋CT3D血管成像(CTA)临床应用[J].实用放射学杂志,2003(8):747-750.
• [16]金文韬,李斌,刘洪超,等.256层CT上肢血管成像对血液透析患者自体动静脉内瘘功能不全的评价[J].实用放射学杂志,2013(4):535-538.

文章评论(Comment)：