刘娅琳;李大欢;胡林;陈峥宏;周力;谭庆华;刘苓;
LIU Yalin1,LI Dahuan1,HU Lin1,CHEN Zhenghong2,ZHOU Li1,TAN Qinghua1,LIU Ling1 (1.Department of Gastroenterology,the Affiliated Hospital of Guiyang Medical College,Guiyang 550004,Guizhou,China;2.Department of Microbiology,Guiyang Medical College,Guiyang 550004,Guizhou,China)

• 1:贵阳医学院附院消化内科
• 2:贵阳医学院微生物学教研室

摘要(Abstract)：

目的:比较快速尿素酶试验(Rapid urease test,RUT)及细菌培养两种方法对幽门螺杆菌(H.pylori)检测的差异。方法:收集有上消化道症状178例患者,内镜下取胃窦近幽门口处黏膜行RUT及H.pylori培养,分析BUT及细菌培养两种方法对幽门螺杆菌检测的敏感性。结果:H.pylori感染率82.5%,其中细菌分离培养阳性95例,阳性率53.4%,敏感性64.6%;136例RUT阳性,阳性率76.4%,敏感性92.5%,两者有统计学差异(P<0.05);服药史是造成细菌培养假阴性的重要因素。结论:RUT及细菌培养两种方法对幽门螺杆菌检测的敏感性存在差异。
Objective: To compare the sensitivity of rapid urease test(RUT) and bacterial culture for detecting Helicobacter pylori in patients infected with H.pylori in Guizhou province,and to analyze the influencing factors.Methods: One hundred and seventy-eight cases among 208 out patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms and received gastroscopy were chosen as subjects.Mucosa specimens at sinus ventriculi near pyloric orifice were collected for RUT,and bacterial cultures were performed with the same specimens.Sensitivities of RUT and bacterial culture were compared.Relationship between them were analyzed combined with general information.Results: The general infection rate of the subjects was 82.5%(147/178).Among the confirmed cases,95 were discoved by H.pylori culture,which gave a positive rate of 53.4%(95/178),and a sensitivity rate of 64.6%(53.4%/82.5%).The number of RUT positive cases was 136,which gave a positve rate of 76.4%(136/178),and a sensitivity rate of 92.5%(76.4%/82.5%).The differences between them were statistically significant(P<0.05).Medication history significantly influenced bacterial culture sensitivity.Conclusions: The sensitivities of RUT and bacterial culture for H.pylori in Guizhou province are different.

关键词(KeyWords)： 螺杆菌,幽门螺;细菌培养;尿素酶
Helicobacter pylori;bacterial culture;urease

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 贵州省优秀科技教育人才省长专项资金资助项目[No.2008-94]

作者(Author): 刘娅琳;李大欢;胡林;陈峥宏;周力;谭庆华;刘苓;
LIU Yalin1,LI Dahuan1,HU Lin1,CHEN Zhenghong2,ZHOU Li1,TAN Qinghua1,LIU Ling1 (1.Department of Gastroenterology,the Affiliated Hospital of Guiyang Medical College,Guiyang 550004,Guizhou,China;2.Department of Microbiology,Guiyang Medical College,Guiyang 550004,Guizhou,China)

Email:

DOI: 10.19367/j.cnki.1000-2707.2011.02.014

参考文献(References)：

• [1]胡伏莲,周殿元.幽门螺杆菌感染的基础与临床[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,237-290.
• [2]Gisbert JP,Trapero M,Pajares JM.Evaluation of3 differ-ent tests for the detection of stool antigens to confirm Heli-cobacter pylori eradication after treatment[J].Gastroen-terol Hepatol,2005(10):615-8.
• [3]王继德,张万岱,周殿元.幽门螺杆菌感染的诊断[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2003(3):139-142.
• [4]胡林,刘苓,谭庆华,等.贵州省幽门螺杆菌临床菌株的分离培养[J].世界华人消化杂志,2009(27):2830-2834.
• [5]中华医学会消化病学分会幽门螺杆菌学组/幽门螺杆菌科研协作组.第三次全国幽门螺杆菌感染若干问题共识报告(2007.庐山)[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2008(1):73-76.
• [6]Solcia E,Villani L,Fiocca R,et al.Effects of eradicationof Helicobacter pylori on gastritis in duodenal ulcer pa-tients[J].Scand J Gastroenterol,1994(Suppl):28-34.
• [7]Nakshabendi IM,Zhang QB,Mokhashi M,et al.Effect ofomeprazole therapy on the survival of Helicobacter pylori,urease activity,and antral gastric histology in patients withduodenal ulcer[J].Helicobacter,1996(3):155-158.
• [8]Xia HX,Keane CT,O'Morain CA.Pre-formed urease ac-tivity of Helicobacter pylori as determined by a viable cellcount technique-clinical implications[J].J Med Microbi-ol,1994(6):435-439.
• [9]刘厚钰.幽门螺杆菌感染检测的选择[J].中华消化杂志,1998(5):259.
• [10]Lee JM,Breslin NP,Fallon C,et al.Rapid urease testslack sensitivity in Helicobacter pylori diagnosis when pep-tic ulcer disease presents with bleeding[J].Am J Gastro-enterol,2000(5):1166-1170.
• [11]李霞,朱尤庆,陈志芬,等.三种常用幽门螺杆菌检测方法的评价[J].实用医学杂志,2005(13):1396-1398.
• [12]郭巍,赵春明,王冰.检测幽门螺杆菌感染的几种方法的评估比较[J].国际检验医学杂志,2008(1):77-78.
• [13]荆孟荔,陈玉丽.幽门螺杆菌两种检测方法的比较[J].福建医药杂志,2004(5):138-139.

文章评论(Comment)：